North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust

Specialist MDT: The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Data Quality

Diagnosing Trust Specialist MDT
No. of Cancer Registry records 222 1200
Performance Status recorded 29% 66%
PSA completed 59% 70%
Gleason Score completed 84% 85%
TNM completed 77% 83%
Risk group assigned 95% 98%

Disease Presentation

Specialist MDT National
No. of men with disease status determined 1183 49027
Percentage of men diagnosed with metastatic disease 17% 13%

Management

Specialist MDT National
No. of men diagnosed with low-risk localised disease 122 3055
Percentage of men with low-risk localised disease receiving radical treatment 0% 5%
No. of men diagnosed with locally advanced disease 509 19663
Percentage of men diagnosed with locally advanced disease receiving radical treatment 70% 71%
No. of men diagnosed with M1 (metastases) 199 6136
Percentage of men diagnosed with M1 (metastases) receiving docetaxel 30% 36%

Patient experience of care

Specialist MDT National
No. of men diagnosed 1st April 18 - 30th Sept 18 who had radical treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) and were sent a questionnaire 279 10750
Percentage of men who responded 81% 78%
No. of men who completed CNS question 218 8137
Percentage of men who were ‘given the name of a CNS’ 93% 87%
No. of men who rated their overall care on a scale of 1-10 215 7878
Percentage of men who rated their overall care as 8 or above 94% 91%

Outcome

Treatment Centre
No. of men who received radical radiotherapy (2017) 56
Adjusted percentage of men receiving a procedure of the large bowel and a diagnosis indicating radiation toxicity (GI complication) (%) 2%

Patient-reported outcomes

Treatment Centre
No. of men diagnosed 1st April 18 - 30th Sept 18 who received external beam radiotherapy and were sent a questionnaire 41
Percentage of men who responded 76%
No. of men who completed sufficient information for a validated EPIC-26 bowel function score to be determined 29
Adjusted EPIC-26 bowel function score (0=worst to 100=best) 80
No. of men who completed sufficient information for a validated EPIC-26 sexual function score to be determined 30
Adjusted EPIC-26 sexual function score (0=worst to 100=best) 17

Compare provider outcomes