Aneurin Bevan University Health Board

Specialist MDT: Aneurin Bevan University Health Board

View Provider Services

Men diagnosed at this hospital trust can access the following services (updated 2019):

  • Diagnostic Facilities:
    • Multiparametric MRI
    • Whole body MRI
    • Isotope bone scan
  • Support Service Facilities:
    • Prostate cancer clinical nurse specialist (PCa CNS)
    • Advanced PCa CNS
    • Urology CNS
    • Sexual function services
    • Specialist continence services
    • Psychological counselling

Data Quality

Diagnosing Trust Specialist MDT
No. of Cancer Registry records 407 407
Performance Status recorded 100% 100%
PSA completed 76% 76%
Gleason Score completed 76% 76%
TNM completed 78% 78%
Risk group assigned 87% 87%

Disease Presentation

Specialist MDT National
No. of men with disease status determined 369 49027
Percentage of men diagnosed with metastatic disease 22% 13%

Management

Specialist MDT National
No. of men diagnosed with low-risk localised disease 28 3055
Percentage of men with low-risk localised disease receiving radical treatment 27% 5%
No. of men diagnosed with locally advanced disease 111 19663
Percentage of men diagnosed with locally advanced disease receiving radical treatment 78% 71%

Patient experience of care

Specialist MDT National
No. of men diagnosed 1st April 18 - 30th Sept 18 who had radical treatment (surgery or radiotherapy) and were sent a questionnaire 51 10750
Percentage of men who responded 78% 78%
No. of men who completed CNS question 38 8137
Percentage of men who were ‘given the name of a CNS’ 84% 87%
No. of men who rated their overall care on a scale of 1-10 36 7878
Percentage of men who rated their overall care as 8 or above 81% 91%

Outcome

Treatment Centre
No. of men who received radical prostatectomy (2018-2019) 49
Adjusted percentage of men who had an emergency readmission within 90 days of radical prostatectomy (%) 8%
No. of men who received radical prostatectomy (2017) 22
Adjusted percentage of men experiencing at least one GU complication requiring a procedural/surgical intervention (%) 9%

Patient-reported outcomes

Treatment Centre
No. of men diagnosed 1st April 18 - 30th Sept 18 who received radical prostatectomy and were sent a questionnaire 18
Percentage of men who responded 83%
No. of men who completed sufficient information for a validated EPIC-26 urinary incontinence score to be determined 15
Adjusted EPIC-26 urinary incontinence score (0=worst to 100=best) 55
No. of men who completed sufficient information for a validated EPIC-26 sexual function score to be determined 14
Adjusted EPIC-26 sexual function score (0=worst to 100=best) 9

Compare provider outcomes